tags 412467 fixed-upstream thanks Florian Ernst wrote: > Hello Justin, hello Michael, hello Joey, > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:27:43AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:25:15PM -0800, Michael Kerrisk wrote: >>>> scanf >> corresponding pointer argument. If the next item of input does not >> match the the conversion specification, the conversion fails >> ^^^^^^^ > > In 2.56 this reduplication is still present, please see the attached > patch. All the other fixes proposed by Justin appear to have been > included.
Sorry -- not sure what happened there. This really is now fixed upstream. Cheers, Michael > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > diff -ruN man-pages-2.56.orig/man3/scanf.3 man-pages-2.56/man3/scanf.3 > --- man-pages-2.56.orig/man3/scanf.3 2007-05-18 11:55:10.000000000 +0200 > +++ man-pages-2.56/man3/scanf.3 2007-06-14 17:18:04.000000000 +0200 > @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ > this specification, and the result is placed in the corresponding > .I pointer > argument. > -If the next item of input does not match the the conversion specification, > +If the next item of input does not match the conversion specification, > the conversion fails \(em this is a > .IR "matching failure" . > .PP -- Michael Kerrisk maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 Want to help with man page maintenance? Grab the latest tarball at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages/ read the HOWTOHELP file and grep the source files for 'FIXME'. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
