tags 429037 patch thanks Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It never made any sense to depend on tetex-base, anyway (except for a > view theoretical special cases which don't apply here). But now, > tetex-base is an empty transitional package which depends on nothing > (and has the sole purpose of replacing old tetex-base's buggy postrm > script). I forgot to add that the Fix is simply to drop that alternative. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)