tags 429037 patch
thanks

Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It never made any sense to depend on tetex-base, anyway (except for a
> view theoretical special cases which don't apply here).  But now,
> tetex-base is an empty transitional package which depends on nothing
> (and has the sole purpose of replacing old tetex-base's buggy postrm
> script).

I forgot to add that the Fix is simply to drop that alternative.

Regards, Frank

-- 
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)

Reply via email to