Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Hm, why did that come to me? I own a package smtm, but sm is foreign > to me. What's the story here Joey?
I see.. sm is still in new. You maintain r-cran-sm which has a source package "sm" so the BTS went with that. I wonder what it will do once the binary package sm (with source package send-message) enters the archive? -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
