On June 13, 2007, Christian Perrier wrote: > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] > tags 427986 moreinfo > usertags 427986 toclose limits-20070630 > thanks > > > I seem to understand you're using "valid users" in the > > [globals] section. If you do so, don't be surprised to get > > unexpected results. "valid users" is a "share" parameters as > > explained in the smb.conf manpage (funnily, it seems to work > > slightly but that may be mor ea kind of side effect than > > anything really intended). > > Again, please send us that information. We really need it to > process this bug and understand whether a real bug lies > somewhere. Frankly speaking, my personal conclusion is that I > see no bug here and more a general rant which is not really > easy to make something with. > > The only thing I see is that you're trying to use "valid users" > in the General section of smb.conf while it pertains to the > shares sections only.
If it is a share only specification, why isn't it a bug if testparm doesn't catch it? Mind you, neither swat or gsambad complain about it being in the wrong place either (that I could see). > Without further details, we'll be forced to close that bug > report. Close it. Gord -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
