> Florian Lohoff wrote : > > # DATE: Sat, Apr 09 2005 06:39:52 -0700 > > date format should look like this : > > << > Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:36:30 +0200 > > > with 9 before Apr, which is not the case of the date you gave. > > libetpan currently does not support such strange date format.
Do I understand correctly that this bug is actually not a bug but a request to support some invalid date format, and Dinh thinks that it is not a good idea to support this invalid format? If so, I will shange this bug's severity to "wishlist" and add "wontfix" tag - because I don't think that libetpan is Debian should support format that upstream libetpan does not support. (or I may just close the bug if submitter agrees). Nikita
pgp57wXLvWFrw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
