On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 20:31 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > The current 2.6.4 version does indeed have extra code to prevent > timeouts happening, however that should only take effect when both sides
In the mean time I noticed other situations where both sides needed to be upgraded. Where I first thought the problem was solved, I now had troubles again. I'll have to look into this extra option: > of the transfer has at least version 2.6.4 and when the --timeout option > is used... But I somehow doubt it will help, as time-outs keep occurring even after several hours. I'll see tomorrow how my backup script went. Thanks for your support, -- Serge van Ginderachter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
