On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:41:51PM -0300, Dererk wrote: > > Thanks for answering so soon, Hendrik! > > I agree 100% with you, there's no sense in risking everyone with a no > longer maintained soft, I didn't even known this fork existed. > > Fortunately it's in heavy development, and, as you mentioned, It's > indeed released on 1.0 RC2. > > I'm giving it a try, and I'm proposing it being packaged. Volunteers? :-) > > > Therefore, I think there's not sense in keeping this two bugs open. I'm > closing this.
Why not retitling/reusing instead? You could retitle one to be used for ispcp, and the other to be left as a record of why it's not worthy to package vhcs (since it's likely that someone will look at it later and be benefitted from this information). -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
