[Sunday 10 April 2005 09:10] Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo (Re: Bug#303954: fuse-utils: Removing the package deletes whatever group was assigned to be able to use fusermount?):
> > The problem is, when I purged the package today, I noticed it just > > removed the "adm" group too, considering it a part, I assume, of > > it's configuration that was to be purged. It makes sense when a new > > group was created for the purpose, but in this case -- and in any > > similar case where someone fills in an already existing group -- I > > don't think it should've done that without even asking. <snip> > Well the fact is that if you had debconf configured to show low > priority questions then you would see question regarding group > deletion. *sigh* Why can't I think of such a very logical explanation myself... > I could raise its priority to be shown even if someone has debconf > set to show only medium priority questions. > > Would it be enough? I think it would be great. I really don't consider this a low priority question. For the aforementioned reason, I mean. If a new group has been created, it makes sense. But in this case, I would've appreciated the possibility to *not* remove the group. Thanks for your quick reply, Tom -- key: http://tmp.verbreyt.be/files/abwaerts.asc
pgpy0KMNb9HFK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
