On Mi, 2007-05-30 at 00:18 -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: > Package: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good > Version: 0.10.5-5 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > This is to let you know I've gotten around to packaging FLAC 1.1.4. As > you may know, this involves not only the usual SONAME change from > > libflac7 -> libflac8 > libflac++5 -> libflac++6 > > but also liboggflac* have been removed, and merged into the main > FLAC library, so there are lots of API considerations involved > with that. You're receiving this bug because your package depends > on one or more of libflac7, libflac++5, liboggflac3, or liboggflac++2. > > By now your upstream sources have transitioned, or at least made #ifdef > style provisions for this new API, especially if your package depends > on liboggflac*. If not, Josh Coalson, the upstream maintainer of FLAC, > has prepared a fairly extensive transition guide on the FLAC web site in > case you want to have a go at making the transition yourself. (What a > dedicated maintainer!): > > http://flac.sourceforge.net/api/group__porting.html > > If you're ready to build against 1.1.4, please download binary packages > or build them from source from here: > > http://people.debian.org/~joshk/ > > i386 and amd64 are available on that page. > > Well, this is a small-time library transition. So this is probably the > only message you'll see about this. I plan to upload 1.1.4 tomorrow > evening if there are no concerns raised about the sanity of this > transition, and you will have until the package clears NEW to prepare. > > Once it hits unstable, you should upload your package on the same day to > mitigate uninstallable packages. (But if anyone complains, tell them > that they're using unstable, and should live with it.) > > Oh, and sorry for the belated transition -- I've been quite busy with > school. Anyway, let me know if there are any problems.
Hi, thanks for reporting. The new upstream releases next week will support the new API already... Bye
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
