On Sat, 19 May 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Fri, 18 May 2007 23:17:50 +0200 > maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > update_initramfs is already settable in /etc/i-t/update-initramfs-conf > > So can we now agree on this? If 'update_initramfs = yes' in that config > file, then a package should run with '-u' with 'all' it should run '-k > all'.
the proposal is to make it tristate [ all | yes | no ] with yes staying as default. david has a good point that update-initramfs should care to do the job so the postinst of each package has just to throw an update-initramfs. > Would you like me to create a patch for the postinst of i-t? afaik aboves idea has nothing to do with i-t postinst, but with update-initramfs, if we all agree that aboves is fine, i'll be happy to make that available for 0.89 sunny greetings -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
