tags 425855 + fixed-upstream pending thanks Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Does this look OK? It covers all the bases, but we might need to be a >> bit more intelligent about which gets used when. This should ideally >> be expressed in the same manner as a Depends line in the control file, >> so we can have arch-specific and alternative packages. >> >> [Sbuild/Conf.pm] >> our @toolchain_regex = ( 'binutils$', 'gcc-[\d.]+$', 'g\+\+-[\d.]+$', >> 'libstdc\+\+', 'libc[\d.]+-dev$', 'linux-kernel-headers$', >> 'linux-libc-dev$', 'gnumach-dev$', 'hurd-dev$', >> 'kfreebsd-kernel-headers$'); > > Sure, I think that's a reasonable stopgap. I think that since this is just compared with the build-essential package list, the extra packages in there, even if obsolete, are harmless. I've committed this upstream. BTW, I'm just testing a patch to allow the automated installation of missing build-essential/toolchain packages, as a configurable option. Would that be useful for you? Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
pgp9q0oeoUxsC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
