On Mon, 14 May 2007 08:30:41 -0700 Daniel Burrows wrote:

> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 11:36:36PM +0200, Francesco Poli
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > I've just found out where the problem lies.
[...]
>   Glad to here what the problem was.  I think, though, that I can do
> what other programs apparently do and manually chmod the pkgstates
> file after I create it.  There's nothing very security-sensitive in
> pkgstates (and you can cut off access to the /var/lib/aptitude
> directory if you really want to hide it to normal users).

That would be *very* useful, I think, as I would be able to set a more
restrictive umask for root, without losing any aptitude functionality
intended for regular users.

Indeed, if explicit permission setting is actually common practice for
other programs, it would be a nice thing to have for aptitude too...

-- 
 http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html
 Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through?
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgp1kMLBMEPNe.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to