On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 13:19 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2007, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > > There was a missing Build-Depends on the xnest server, leaving the > > default gdm configuration with no xnest capabilities at all. This should > > be fixed in gdm 2.18.1-3. > > Yes; except it's now build-deping on xephyr and it will run xephyr. We > would need a wrapper around the xnest/xephyr programs to select the > best available one, but we don't have that currently.
I noticed that xephyr was available. I installed xserver-xephyr to make sure it wasn't an "xnest vs xephyr" issue. So, now I am guessing xnest will be deprecated, which is fine, as xephyr is the "new whizbang" thinger. So, will it work with xnest at all? If not, I'd have to believe that this should be clearly documented and and made to have a "conflicts with" on xephyr to make sure something doesn't break. Cheers to the hard work you all put in the GNOME DE, including you Josselin. I appreciate it truly. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05 Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74 E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
