--- Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > On Fri May 11 11:20, Matthew Johnson wrote: > > In terms of packaging, we probably want to have them as a separate > > source package (I think), which produces a binary package which > > fretsonfire depends on. Something like fretsonfire-data-sectoid? We > > could then have fretsonfire-data-inkila in non-free for the songs from > > upstream.
I agree :) > I have packaging for this now at > http://mjj29.matthew.ath.cx/fretsonfire-data-sectoid.debian.tar.gz, > which includes a get-orig-source target to create the source tarball. > I've also updated the fretsonfire packaging in svn to depend on it. I'll > add the sectoid packaging to svn if people agree with this approach I wonder if it would be better to just recommend it, instead on depending on it. We should also create some Provides: name for all the packages including FoF songs, i guess. We should also include the tutorial song somewhere, don't we? Miry ______________________________________________ LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
