Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Why does lynx need an executable stack?
Apparently, it doesn't. Looked into it a bit more and bug #336138[1] is that due to liblzo1 being compiled partially from assembly, without a .note.GNU-stack, it defaults to executable. This causes issues for all rdeps of liblzo1 (liblzo -> gnutls -> lynx). So the fix would be in getting them to make a release that includes that. I've done a NMUish update for liblzo1 that appears to fix this problem that can be found here: http://www.variadic.org/debian/etch/liblzo1/ I'll check with the liblzo1 folks. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=336138 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
