* Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070509 16:56]:
> I just try experimental version of reprepro that should have the
> AlsoAcceptFor header (that I ask for a few months ago :-) ).
> But it does not seem to work :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/mainteneur/dovecot$ reprepro [...] remove
> etch-backports dovecot
> No distribution definition of 'etch-backports' found in [...]
Oh, currently AlsoAcceptFor is onyl a mean to control which things
are accepted by the include command without --ignore=wrongdistribution,
not an full fledged alias.
> Is it me that do not use AlsoAcceptFor correctly, or is this a bug ?
I you need it, I could add another field (Let's call it alias) to also allow
this usage. Though that might be a bit confusing as then there are
AlsoAcceptFor and Alias which are similar bit significantly different.
I don't want to change AlsoAcceptFor, because
- the name has Accept in it, so it would be strange to use it otherwise
- a name can be given in multiple AlsoAcceptFor statements currently
(as it can be quite nice to accept for "unstable" as kernel-package
output uses it or unchanged .changes files from somewhere else)
while an alias for delete should be checked to be unique.
- I'd be to anxious to use such aliases in my config to avoid deleting
things in the wrong distribution, but still want to be able to use
it while including packages.
> I also tried to create /home/vdanjean/debian/archive/conf/incoming
incoming rules affect only the processincoming command.
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
