On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 03:46:05PM +0200, Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > It also changes the non-file backed operation mode to use anonymous > mmap instead of new char[].
Does this solve an observed problem? I'd expect these to do more-or-less the same thing. (won't matter for small amounts, and the C++ allocator should be using anonymous mmap for large allocations). The one advantage I see (which could be considerable!) is that mremap() avoids copies. Does this save enough time to make it worth using a more opaque idiom? (I don't know the answer) Other than that, the code looks OK to me (haven't tested it). Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
