On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:55:39PM +0200, Martin Stigge wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 09:05 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > > I'm wondering about the kernel version: Since the source packet as it is > > > now is build-depending on linux-source-2.6.18 which is not in sid > > > anymore, it will not build on sid right now, I guess? Do you expect the > > > kernel version upgrade to be a big issue? Which steps are needed? > > > > exactely. Well, I already updated the x86_32 config and necessary files > > so you should repeat all of the above using sid's 2.6.20 and the current > > svn[1] files for user-mode-linux (or a snapshot package I made > > yesterday[2]). Then send me the diff (or the source package stuff, I'll > > diff it here), I'm going to upload uml-2.6.20 asap. > > > > [1]: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-uml > > [2]: http://people.debian.org/~malattia/packages/uml/ > > I just tested the sources from [2], package built fine with the supplied > config.amd64 (except for lots of questions of course). I also installed > it, and an uml with etch booted up nicely.
the many questions were expected as that config was still a 2.6.18 one and in 2.6.20 many options have changed. I had lots of them here on i386 too. > I'll do a bit more testing and will send you a diff for the adjusted > config.amd64 in the next 1-2 days. great, thanks! could you try using the i386 config as a starting point? or eventually just make sure that most of the modules/options enabled there are enabled on amd64 as well. Many thanks again! -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
