On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 21:52 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > I like this patch, with one small change. I would like $NO_CHANGE_VALUE > to be $ZAP_NO_CHANGE to reduce the likelihood of name conflict by making > it more "adzapper specific". I'll be applying it, using $ZAP_NO_CHANGE, > to the master adzapper source.
Sure. I actually thought about that but I have to admit that after it was working I was too lazy. Sorry about that. Ludovic, do you want a new patch for the debian specific files? > Johannes, thanks for the code! Thanks for incorporating it :) johannes PS: You might have accidentally opened a new bug by replying to my email which was CC'ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I suppose since this mail had no pseudo-headers you'd have gotten an error. If you did get an error please just ignore it, if not then you can let me know the bug number and I'll instruct the bug tracking system to close the other bug or merge with this one. I've changed the CC on this mail to the correct one, sorry for the trouble and the double mail that went to you, I shouldn't have CC'ed you on the bug submission but relied on debbugs to mail you after creating the bug.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
