-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:09:33AM -0400, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
>
>>The java packing team just got blindsided by bug #300209, which
>>appears to have knocked tomcat4 out of Sarge. Heads up that you
>>may hear some begging for re-inclusion in the near future.
>
>
> You mean there's no chance that people will actually fix the bug instead so
> that tomcat4 will get back in without begging?
>
> If the bug should actually be downgraded as has recently been suggested,
> then please downgrade it; the maintainers surely know better than the
> release team whether this bug has an inflated severity, but the report went
> three weeks before anyone commented on it -- maintainers need to be more
> responsive than that to RC bugs, even if it's just to explain why they're
> not RC.
>
Steve,
I apologize for not seeing this bug; I have been trying to pick up
the slack on tomcat4 while Stefan and Arnaud have been snowed under with
other things. We will indeed impose the appropriate runtime
dependencies for the package and include that in the pending release. I
started looking in Apache's documentation for the actual runtime version
dependencies last night, since I would rather impose the correct
versions and not just the ones we currently know that work.
Regards,
- --
Barry Hawkins
All Things Computed
site: www.alltc.com
weblog: www.yepthatsme.com
Registered Linux User #368650
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCVRYvHuKcDICy0QoRAqc9AJ9okOTtEVVn6Xc7xipqNDhPCfdihACeLYTQ
PlM8hMRyyHk/OivXHR1+514=
=DmPj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
