user [EMAIL PROTECTED] usertags 421919 builddep-tetex-ftbfs thanks Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Relevant parts: > (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/fontenc.sty > (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/t1enc.def)kpathsea: Running mktextfm > ecrm1095 > mktextfm: Running mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=ljfour; mag:=1; nonstopmode; > input ecrm1095 > This is METAFONT, Version 2.71828 (Web2C 7.5.6) > kpathsea: Running mktexmf ecrm1095 > > ! I can't find file `ecrm1095'. That's an interesting one: It used only texlive-latex-base as Build-Dep. It's already fixed by adding tl-latex-recommended, I hope it works this time. (Hint: This wouldn't have happened if all packages uploaded to the archive were built in clean chroots...) I wonder whether we should think of gathering information about a potential "texlive-builddep" package. While there are reasons that collection-latexbase does not contain the EC fonts, most packages that build-depend on TeX will need them, and there might be similar cases. Or we just suggest maintainers to start with texlive-latex-recommended instead of -base? Or we make clean-chroot-builds mandatory? Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
