merge 416123 390703 thanks On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Michael Biebl wrote: > Depending on a dev package is wrong, digikam should only depend on > libgphoto-2.0-2.
Michael, Agreed. That's why bug #390703 is still open. > If that causes problems (as I read in another bug report), please get > this issue fixed properly by fixing the gphoto package and not by adding > this dirty workaround. As outlined in the upstream forward for #390703, the issue is that digikam does not, as it should, read the .so files in libgphoto2-2. But rather digikam reads the .la files in libgphoto2-2-dev! Until digikam upstream can resolve this issue, the best workaround is for digikam to depend on libgphoto2-2-dev and the user can access camera's via libgphoto. Mark
pgpDqEySC5OPz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
