On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:25:40AM -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote: > <quote who="Vincent Lefevre" date="Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:11:35PM +0200"> > > > > They fix the problem, but there are so many Scanning messages that > > the diagnostic messages "Header ... could not be parsed" are not > > really visible. > > I might suppress that when I apply the patch.
My intention, at this stage, was to capture the lines that were unparseable, so that I could investigate them and fix the holes in the parser. I agree that this diagnostic is probably unsuitable in a production version though, so I wouldn't question your choice in removing it for packaging. I need to research what the filename*0=".." syntax means to understand what has to be done with it. Cheers Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
