On Wednesday 25 April 2007 20:27, Brad Roberts wrote: > > What I object to is hiding a known consistency problem. Yes, there are > others, but its hard to report on something you can't detect. This one is > detected and shouldn't be hidden, at least not by default. >
An option to disable the behavior would also be fine by me. Maybe in the dumptypes definition? Regards Claudio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
