Might this addition to a Debian bug report about saslauthd leaking memory be helpful?
Regards, -Roberto On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 04:52:26PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote: > Hi, > > I got annoyed by saslauthd consuming more than 2Gig of RAM so I started > looking into this issue. My findings: > > - The leak does NOT happen on successful authentication. I sent 500000 > valid auth. requests to saslauthd and its memory usage did not > increase. > > - I sent just a couple of invalid authentication requests and > saslauthd's memory usage started to climb. So this is a trivially > exploitable remote DoS (send a large amount of bad passwords to any > sasl-using service and wait until the OOM killer kicks in and renders > your box useless). > > - The leak is NOT related to libpam-mysql, it happens with the plain > pam_unix module as well. > > - When using just pam_unix, valgrind gives the following trace segment: > > ==17824== 68 bytes in 17 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 7 of 7 > ==17824== at 0x40064B0: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149) > ==17824== by 0x425AAF12: (within /lib/ld-2.5.so) > ==17824== by 0x425AC5B4: (within /lib/ld-2.5.so) > ==17824== by 0x425B6450: (within /lib/ld-2.5.so) > ==17824== by 0x425B2401: (within /lib/ld-2.5.so) > ==17824== by 0x425B5E9D: (within /lib/ld-2.5.so) > ==17824== by 0x42709C2C: (within /lib/i686/cmov/libdl-2.5.so) > ==17824== by 0x425B2401: (within /lib/ld-2.5.so) > ==17824== by 0x4270A2AB: (within /lib/i686/cmov/libdl-2.5.so) > ==17824== by 0x42709B60: dlopen (in /lib/i686/cmov/libdl-2.5.so) > ==17824== by 0x4352838F: (within /lib/libpam.so.0.79) > ==17824== by 0x4352852B: (within /lib/libpam.so.0.79) > ==17824== by 0x435292F3: _pam_init_handlers (in /lib/libpam.so.0.79) > ==17824== by 0x4352726E: pam_start (in /lib/libpam.so.0.79) > ==17824== by 0x804B1F4: auth_pam (auth_pam.c:207) > > The number of lost blocks equals to the invalid authentication requests > I sent to saslauthd. This seems to suggest that something forgets to > clean up when an authentication request fails. > > The amount of leaked memory seems to be dependent on the PAM module > being used. pam_unix seems to be the 'nicest'; with libpam_mysql, I get > about 60 KiB of memory lost for every failed authentication attempt, > according to 'ps' output. > > Gabor > -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature