On Fre, 20 Apr 2007, Frank Küster wrote: > I do not know. But I think this is one more reason why we should *not* > ship copies of configuration files in TEXMFDIST, where they will happily > be picked up if the conffile is removed. > > - It deprives the local admin of the possibility to remove a conf(ig)file > > - In this case, it hides a misconfiguration; format generation during > configuration of texlive-base-bin (or at least tl-latex-base) should > not have succeeded in the first place
Ok, all of them? Currently we have copy for the following files: /etc/texmf/metafont/misc/modes.mf /etc/texmf/tex/generic/config/pdftexconfig.tex /etc/texmf/tex/latex/pict2e/pict2e.cfg /etc/texmf/tex/latex/contour/contour.cfg /etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/color.cfg /etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/graphics.cfg /etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/hyperref.cfg pdftexconfig.tex and modes.mf should probably be moved (so that format generation fails), but the other 5 are input files which does not harm to have them around. Or? Best wishes Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Università di Siena Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian TeX Group gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OK, so ten out of ten for style, but minus several million for good thinking, yeah? --- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]