On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 12:53:45PM +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 02:41 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Well, the "another version" is just a dummy package at this point anyway... > > But yeah, not carrying an unnecessary dummy package into the next stable > > release is a good enough reason, so binNMUs scheduled for 12 packages in > > all.
> Just FYI: the next version of cyrus-sasl2 will drop the dummy packages, > and as part of that we're going to monitor for packages that become > uninstallable because of this. Ok, hopefully all the builds will be done before that happens regardless :) > > cyrus-sasl2-mit would still need to be updated, though, and has a > > hard-coded dep. > AFAICS, it's scheduled to be removed from the archive, as cyrus-sasl2 > now provides the same functionality (#419418). Ah, indeed, it seems that the version of libsasl2-gssapi-mit in the archive for etch/lenny is not from the cyrus-sasl2-mit source package, which means cyrus-sasl2-mit provides only one obsolete binary package currently and is not uploadable in its current state -- so yes, this should definitely be removed from the archive. > Apparently there was no transition package that would have pulled in > libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit (the package that now provides this > functionality). Should we provide the transition for lenny in > cyrus-sasl2? Hrm, rather, libsasl2-gssapi-mit appears to already be that transition package. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
