Hi Jouni!
On Son, 03 Apr 2005, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> I ended up doing this a bit differently, i.e., without adding additional
> for loop and just using the previous for loop for both SSID is set and
Good. I thought about this, too, but then, without much insight into the
real working of the code I thought a double loop is not a problem, we
are not speaking about travelling salesman problems ;-) but about simple
lists with, well, probably not more than 100 entries ;-)
> not set cases. In addition, I added code for rejecting APs based on
> Privacy flag mismatch in order to make this bit more useful in
Very good.
> environments where there are more than on AP. The changes are now in
> wpa_supplicant CVS repository (development branch).
Great. Thanks!
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at> Università di Siena
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +43 (0) 59966-690018
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IPSWICH (n.)
The sound at the other end of the telephone which tells you that the
automatic exchange is working very hard but is intending not actually
to connect you this time, merely to let you know how difficult it is.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
