This one time, at band camp, Matus UHLAR - fantomas said: > Hello, > > as I run clamav from volatile (although viruses don't affect my system), I > prefer clamav at least to be more quiet. 24 notifications each day for each > machine is not nice... > > I can agree with Andrew that if anyone chooses only to run clamav from > stable, they don't care about newer versions. > > However I would really consider the reason for running clamav at all - > clamav is very good at keeping unwanted e-mail out of my machine, and if > that kind of unwanted mail changes, and clamav is not able to keep up, I'd > like clamav to change too.
That is precisely the problem, and the thing upstream is trying to address (perhaps a little noisily, I'm happy to admit). I am unwilling to deviate from upstream on this issue, just to be blunt. Clamav and the virus world is just too fast moving of a target to want to encourage running a several year old version. There are newer versions made trivially available in volatile, although sometimes it takes a few days to appear there. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
