Dear Russ, I believe that you are correct. It seems that it believes that it uses 2.4kernel. I uploaded the files at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ipandis/linux/openafs/
Regards, -Ippokratis. On 4/15/07, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ippokratis Pandis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: openafs-modules-source > Version: 1.4.2-6 > Severity: important > Justification: fails to build from source > In my ia64 machine I installed etch stable and then tried to install > openafs client. Unfortunately, openafs-modules-source fails to > build. There are two problems one minor and one major. > The first (and minor) problem is that it tries to use an invalid flag > (-mb-step). The error message is the following: > --- > cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-mb-step" > make[5]: *** [afs_atomlist.o] Error 1 > --- > And then the second (and major) problem appears: > --- > In file included from /usr/src/modules/openafs/src/util/afs_atomlist.c:11: > /usr/src/modules/openafs/include/afs/param.h:63:31: > linux/modversions.h: No such file or directory > --- > I had the same problem when I was using sarge and reported it > (Bug#411818). I am reporting it as a new bug since now I am using Etch. Both of these problems indicate that you're trying to build a 2.4 kernel module against a 2.6 kernel. You never did reply to my last message on the previous bug, but now that I look at it again, the problem is fairly clear. So, the question is why it thinks you have a 2.4 kernel when clearly you don't. Could you send a complete copy of your build log for the kernel module? I need to see everything starting from exactly what configure parameters were passed through all of the compiler lines. Thank you! -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
-- ------------------------------------------------------- Ippokratis Pandis Ph.D. candidate Carnegie Mellon University Phone: +1 412 877 5134 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ipandis/ -------------------------------------------------------
