Hi Michael, hi all Debian TeX Maintainers, On Fre, 13 Apr 2007, Michael Prokop wrote: > But /usr/share/doc/texlive* ships more than 80MB though I don't have > any doc-packages (besides texlive-doc-base which is a dependency of > texlive-base) on my system : > > # du -sh /usr/share/doc/texlive* > 4.4M /usr/share/doc/texlive-base > 9.9M /usr/share/doc/texlive-base-bin > 92K /usr/share/doc/texlive-common > 1.8M /usr/share/doc/texlive-doc > 1.1M /usr/share/doc/texlive-doc-base > 3.1M /usr/share/doc/texlive-fonts-recommended > 332K /usr/share/doc/texlive-lang-german > 37M /usr/share/doc/texlive-latex-base > 23M /usr/share/doc/texlive-latex-recommended > > :( > > Any chance that you can provide all the big files (especially the > PDF files) in a separate, optional doc-package?
First, I don't consider this a real big package tohave 80Mb lying around. Today's disks are big and fast. Second, separating this stuff would be a big diversion from upstreams collection system. I guess we could build a way around this, but I am not convinced that this makes a big advantage. All here, other opinions, should we look into a separation? I am against this, but if the general opinion is pro I can take a look at the perl code again ;-) Best wishes Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Università di Siena Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian TeX Group gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WHAPLODE DROVE (n.) A homicidal golf stroke. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]