Package: tesseract Version: 1.02-3 Severity: minor I'm not happy with the current package description. http://people.debian.org/~walters/descriptions.html gives valuable hints on how to write it.
"commercial quality" is marketing jargon, for many free software people an euphemism for "broken crap". The development history (including year numbers 1985, 1995, 2005) is also irrelevant to about 99.99% of the users, right? Unfortunately I don't know enough about tesseract to come up with an alternative text (and my English is far from perfect). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
