Hi, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > The package is now updated. I think a package would be now even more
The binary packages, yes, which we obviusly can't use. > useful, because the current version available from their web site does > not work with 64 bit machines: > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76096 > packaging it could solve the problem, even though in our setting we I continue bet that it still doesn't compile in a OOo2 environment (as it didn't in at the time you filed the bug, and as the author appaarently doesn't care about getting it to build in something non-ancient). And as there isn't a OOo 1.1.x anywhere anymore in Debian... Gr��e/Regards, Ren� -- .''`. Ren� Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
