tags 303005 - help thanks Hello Sean,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 11:33:47PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 07:00:10PM -0400, Sean Finney wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:29:47AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > > > it signs mail body. > > > Your gpg-signed message is very different: > > > * it contains the following header field: > > > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; > > > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp" > > > * GPG signature encloses the whole mail, including attachments. > > > Of course this can be emulated, but then you have to sign mails for every > > > translation. Or did I miss something? > > > > oh, i didn't realize that the script sent mails with attachments in > > them, that's a different matter altogether. all the above patch did was > > clearsign the message body (which still at least verifies the > > authenticity of the message). > > > > unfortunately clearsigning doesn't work with attachments, so what would > > need to be done is encapsulate the entire message body in a > > multipart/mixed mime object, sign it and tack the signature on as > > an attachment, and thenput that in a multipart/signed object. > > > > well, guess i get to do that then :) > > Yes, please, thus I drop the patch tag too. For your interest, I added a --mutt option. This allows to send multiple mails and to sign them properly. If you are not using mutt, there is a --postpone option, which will produce a mailbox. Your mailer may be able to use it. Thus I'm dropping the help tag (the bug was also tagged pending a few minutes ago). Kind Regards, -- Nekral -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
