Package: bacula-common
Version: 2.0.3-2
Severity: normal
A narrow issue and a broader one:
The changelog refers to README.Debian, but I do not see it in
/usr/share/doc/bacula-{doc,common}, the only two packages I have
installed.
More broadly, I am trying to find out what issues, if any, await me if
I upgrade to the current version. In particular, the upstream release
notes say there is a change in the data format. The Debian changelog
seems indicate it's handled automatically, but it would be good to
indicate that explicitly in the README.Debian. It may be there; I
can't tell.
I also have 2 versions of postgres, which is what originally sent me
to the README.
I have a system that is waiting for a full bacula install, and so was
able to get pieces of the new package. It would be nice if there were
a way to find out such issues without doing the install, since after
the upgrade is a little late to discover upgrading wasn't a good idea.
Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'oldstable'), (50, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages bacula-common depends on:
ii adduser 3.102 Add and remove users and groups
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.13 Debian configuration management sy
bacula-common recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
