Le lundi 09 avril 2007 à 20:38 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine a écrit : > Sigh, I understand it is expected, but I find it ugly. If someone would > use just one single python version has to install tons of packages for > all other versions too. In the specific case I have to install also both > 2.4 and 2.5 editions for every modules the program use. I know it does > not require installation of all python interpreters too, but it does not > make me feel better :)
No, that doesn't install any more packages, as these are all virtual packages. The result is that you install the same set of packages, but with a guarantee that your dependencies are meaningful. > So I have definitively to use Python-Depends even if the program > deos not provide public modules/extensions? Is that documented? No, you don't have to use it in this case. It is mandatory only when you use Provides:, which is meaningless only for public modules and extensions. See the python policy update that was discussed on debian-python recently. Cheers, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
