On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:58:03AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > So, at the moment I'm tagging this bug report as wontfix, but diverting > the more general question of "should we mandate inclusion of debugging > symbols in OCaml bytecode libraries"? to the debian-ocaml-maint mailing > list. On one hand we should be consistent with the general library > philosophy of not including debugging symbols in packages other than > -dbg. On the other it is true that a user willing to have performances > will use native code libraries, but is still true that native code > libraries are not available everywhere ...
I've just commit a change to our policy which mandates the compilation of bytecode libraries with -g and forbid it for bytecode programs. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
