I am a victim of abuse.. a person put my email in much mailing list... PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE ME!!!!
Guia Artistica www.guiaartistica.com.ar -----Mensaje original----- De: Steve Langasek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Lunes, 09 de Abril de 2007 07:30 a.m. Para: Frederic Daniel Luc Lehobey; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Bug#418346: upgrade-reports: undeclared conflict between pppconfig and manpages-fr breaks sarge to etch upgrade clone 418346 -1 -2 reassign -1 pppconfig retitle -1 pppconfig: missing Replaces: manpages-fr (<< 2.39.1-5) user debian-release@lists.debian.org usertag -1 etch-r1 reassign -2 release-notes severity -2 minor retitle -2 example dist-upgrade command in 4.5.3 known to fail before 4.5.6 close 418346 thanks Hi Frederic, Thank you for your report. On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 12:04:28PM +0200, Frederic Daniel Luc Lehobey wrote: > When performing an upgrade from sarge to etch, closely following the > current release notes, the initial upgrade (from section 4.5.4 of the > release notes) breaks in the following way: <snip> > The following packages will be upgraded: > pppconfig > 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 468 not > upgraded. > Need to get 0B/158kB of archives. After unpacking 406kB will be freed. > Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] > (Reading database ... 72503 files and directories currently installed.) > Preparing to replace pppconfig 2.3.11 (using > .../pppconfig_2.3.15_all.deb) ... > Unpacking replacement pppconfig ... > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/pppconfig_2.3.15_all.deb > (--unpack): > trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/fr/man8/pppconfig.8.gz', which is > also in package manpages-fr > I have experienced the probleÃm during two upgrades (yesterday night and > this morning) and the two obvious workarounds: > - remove first pppconfig > or > - install manpages-fr (from etch) > are both working. > Hence the problem should be solved by a proper conflict to be added to > these packages. As it breaks the upgrade for french users I suppose it > deserves at least to be added to the errata. I think the first step is to plan to fix this bug in pppconfig for the first etch point release. Bug cloned and reassigned. > ---- > By the way (it is unrelated, sorry...) the suggested command in section > 4.5.3 of the relase notes breaks in the following way (when performed > at this early step of the upgrade): > # LANG=C aptitude -y -s -f --with-recommends dist-upgrade > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree > Reading extended state information > Initializing package states... Done > Reading task descriptions... Done > Some packages had unmet dependencies. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > xlibmesa-gl: Depends: xfree86-common but it is not installable > Conflicts: libgl1 which is a virtual package. > xlibmesa-glu: Depends: xfree86-common but it is not installable > Conflicts: libglu1 which is a virtual package. > libglu1-mesa: Conflicts: libglu1 which is a virtual package. > libgamin0: Conflicts: libfam0c102 but 2.7.0-6sarge1 is installed and > it is kept back. > Conflicts: libfam0 but it is not installable > libfam0c102: Conflicts: libfam0 but it is not installable > libgl1-mesa-glx: Conflicts: libgl1 which is a virtual package. Yes, this is quite predictable. Perhaps that's worth a footnote or something in the release notes as well? Cloned to the release-notes package for consideration. Since these are the only two issues mentioned in your upgrade report and both are now assigned to other packages, I'm going to close this bug. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
