Martin Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I still get a segmentation fault. :( And the packages provided did not > contain any debugging symbols, so it's tricky to know why. Next time I'm > networked I'll try to remember fetching all requiered libraries for > building packages myself, but I'm afraid that's only if I remember it.
I cannot reproduce the problem. It'd be nice if you could rebuild libticalcs4 with debugging and obtain a backtrace. Given how ticalc_get_error() is written, the segfault will probably only happen in some memory configuration. There's probably a small buffer overflow in there (as per TiLP's tradition, you're due to have a buffer overflow of some kind in each release :)). JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
