On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:41:39PM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > This software is available in experimental state. > Who knows if 1.0.0. doesn't suffer of such critical bugs ?
> It's too recent to be included in a Debian stable release, morever, have > you experiencied any issue with this ntfs-3g version ? > I don't think so.... => Invalid. > Contact debian-release if you have some serious reason to request > ntfs-3g 1.0.0. inclusion into etch. >From my POV, the question is not whether ntfs-3g 1.0.0 should be included in etch (it won't be), but whether the risk of this data loss is significant enough that we should consider dropping ntfs-3g from etch altogether for the sake of our users' data. Since ntfs-3g didn't ship with any previous release, and has no reverse-dependencies in etch, it doesn't seem unreasonable to drop it from the release, and that seems to be in keeping with our policy of treating data loss bugs with the highest severity? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
