* Andreas Jochens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On 05-Apr-01 16:06, Eric Dorland wrote: > > It's not wrong, it's just I think the mozilla developers have their > > own typedefs they would rather have used. > > Actually I just found a slightly different patch in the Fedora core > distribution which addresses the same issue. It uses some special > typedefs but the result is the same.
Err, can I have it, or is it a secret? :) > > bug. If you need me to file it upstream, let me know. > > Please file it if you have the time for it. I will. -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
