On Monday 02 April 2007 18:33, Peter Nuttall wrote: > D-I questions: I just pressed enter at the prompt, and set my keyboard > and location to enGB. On reaching the disk stage, I asked it to set up > hda as a LVM with / /home /tmp and /var on seperate paritions. On > checking the result seemed to suggest no changes to /dev/sda or > /dev/sdb. I have attached syslog and partman from /var/log/installer.
This seems correct to me. Guided partitioning on hda should in no way affect the two SATA disks, and the partman log at least shows they are unchanged at the end. At start of partitioning ======================== parted_server: OUT: 1 32256-300066439679 300066407424 primary ext3 /dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 parted_server: OUT: 1 32256-300066439679 300066407424 primary ext3 /dev/scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 At end of partitioning ======================== parted_server: OUT: 1 32256-300066439679 300066407424 primary ext3 /dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 parted_server: OUT: 1 32256-300066439679 300066407424 primary ext3 /dev/scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 I do similar partitioning myself sometimes and have never seen changes to another disk than the one selected. the next possibility I considered that the installation of the boot loader could have gone wrong: that grub could have thought that one of the SATA disks was "the first disk in the system" instead of the IDE disk. However, the syslog shows that went correctly as well: Apr 2 11:04:17 grub-installer: info: Installing grub on '(hd0)' [...] Apr 2 11:04:25 grub-installer: (hd0)^I/dev/hda Apr 2 11:04:25 grub-installer: (hd1)^I/dev/sda Apr 2 11:04:25 grub-installer: (hd2)^I/dev/sdb (And even if the wrong disk was selected, I don't think it would have affected the RAID.) However, the syslog does show some strange activity while the installer is probing for other operating systems: Apr 2 10:45:49 os-prober: debug: running /usr/lib/os-probes/50mounted-tests on /dev/discs/disc1/part1 Apr 2 10:45:48 kernel: EXT2-fs: sdb1: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (4). Apr 2 10:45:48 kernel: EXT3-fs: INFO: recovery required on readonly filesystem. Apr 2 10:45:48 kernel: EXT3-fs: write access will be enabled during recovery. Apr 2 10:45:48 kernel: kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds Apr 2 10:45:48 kernel: EXT3-fs: recovery complete. Apr 2 10:45:48 kernel: EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Apr 2 10:45:48 50mounted-tests: debug: mounted as ext3 filesystem [...] Apr 2 10:45:49 os-prober: debug: running /usr/lib/os-probes/50mounted-tests on /dev/discs/disc1/part1 Apr 2 10:45:49 kernel: EXT2-fs: sda1: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (4). Apr 2 10:45:49 kernel: EXT3-fs: INFO: recovery required on readonly filesystem. Apr 2 10:45:49 kernel: EXT3-fs: write access will be enabled during recovery. Apr 2 10:45:49 kernel: kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds Apr 2 10:45:49 kernel: EXT3-fs: recovery complete. Apr 2 10:45:49 kernel: EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Apr 2 10:45:49 50mounted-tests: debug: mounted as ext3 filesystem [...] Apr 2 11:04:14 os-prober: debug: running /usr/lib/os-probes/50mounted-tests on /dev/discs/disc1/part1 Apr 2 11:04:14 kernel: EXT2-fs warning (device sda1): ext2_fill_super: mounting ext3 filesystem as ext2 Apr 2 11:04:14 50mounted-tests: debug: mounted as ext2 filesystem [...] Apr 2 11:04:14 os-prober: debug: running /usr/lib/os-probes/50mounted-tests on /dev/discs/disc2/part1 Apr 2 11:04:14 kernel: EXT2-fs warning (device sdb1): ext2_fill_super: mounting ext3 filesystem as ext2 Apr 2 11:04:14 50mounted-tests: debug: mounted as ext2 filesystem I have no idea what this means exactly. I suggest asking a file system expert look at this. The only advise I can give ATM is not to panic and not to take hasty actions. Cheers, FJP
pgpKdYVpPj0MV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
