Package: xzgv
Version: 0.8-5.1
Followup-For: Bug #379869


I see the same bug on my etch amd64 system. 

Recompiling xzgv 0.8-5.1 from source without changes with gcc 4.1.1-15 still
gives the same bug.

Changing "-O2" to "-O" in debian/rules and recompiling fixes most (but not
all) problems. If you more than one screen of directories and enter one of
them, and then go back via "..", any directories not currently on screen
will have blank thumbnail instead of directory thumbnail. 
if you go back via ".." to directory with pictures however, the problem does
not manifest itself and you can see all picture thumbnails normally.

Compiling without any "-O" options seems to completely fix the problem in
all the cases as far as I can see.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (550, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-1-amd64
Locale: LANG=hr_HR, LC_CTYPE=hr_HR (charmap=ISO-8859-2)

Versions of packages xzgv depends on:
ii  gdk-imlib11               1.9.14-31      imaging library for use with gtk
ii  libc6                     2.3.6.ds1-13   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libglib1.2                1.2.10-17      The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2                 1.2.10-18      The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libjpeg62                 6b-13          The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libpng12-0                1.2.15~beta5-1 PNG library - runtime
ii  libtiff4                  3.8.2-7        Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libx11-6                  2:1.0.3-6      X11 client-side library
ii  libxext6                  1:1.0.1-2      X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxi6                    1:1.0.1-4      X11 Input extension library
ii  zlib1g                    1:1.2.3-13     compression library - runtime

xzgv recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to