On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 06:24:20PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: [...] > Second, the order of priority of the three packages providing Octave support > for Emacsen is currently the following: > > 1) octave2.9-emacsen > 2) octave2.1-emacsen > 3) emacs21-el > > The octave2.*-emacsen packages contains the ultimate Emacs Lisp source files > for the Octave support, meaning that they are preferable than the ones in > emacs21-el. Also, the files in octave2.1-emacsen are not newer than the > ones in octave2.9-emacsen. So, the priority order above is fortunate > (although it was not designed to be so). >
I agree with you, but I have no idea about the order in which Emacs considers its subdirs when scanning for its .elc files. So what if two or three versions of octave-mod.elc are available ? Which one will be used ? If you're sure that Emacs will consider the right one, I agree that this bug report is void. Pascal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
