On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 12:56 +0100, schönfeld / in-medias-res wrote: > Stefan Völkel schrieb: > > Erik Grinaker wrote: > > Yeah, it is definitely a good idea, but right now there isn't any nice > > way to do this. I think the only sensible solution would be to write a > > network server which Revelation could connect to and use to store shared > > account data. > > I don't understand why it is so hard to export just a selected entry, > but that is something you have to know.
It's not hard, but I don't want to add all sorts of features just because I can. If I did that, then Revelation would just become a bloated, hard-to-use mess, so I need to be critical of what functionality I put in. As there isn't too much demand for this (you're the first to request it in 4 years), and since it's not too hard to accomplish what you want anyway (copy/paste the accounts into a new file), I don't see any good reason to include this. > But: A network server as you describe it, is definitively NOT what i did > ask for. It seems to me like you try to beat a little sweet mice with a > big-fat amboss. What i basically need is just simple and that is what it > should be, because otherwise the feature is useless. If it needs a > network server to exchange account data, which needs to be setup, thats > really really far from what i want. I know you didn't ask for a network server, and for your situation it might not be a good solution. But in general, for sharing accounts between multiple people a network server is really the only sensible solution. Say you have 10 or more users - doing manual export/import is never going to work. -- Erik Grinaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://erikg.codepoet.no/ "We act as though comfort and luxury were the chief requirements of life, when all that we need to make us happy is something to be enthusiastic about." -- Albert Einstein
