On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 10:54:58PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Package: imapproxy
> > Version: 1.2.4-10
> > Severity: important
> >
> > The pid-handling of imapproxy is pretty fragile, as documented in
> > #369020 amongst others. The current workaround of writing a new pidfile
> > after start based on 'ps ax' output is, eh, fragile at best, and
> > actually pretty bad.
> >
> > The proper solution would be to patch imapproxy so that it writes out a
> > pidfile itself, like proper daemons should. 
> Fixed. Will submit the patch ASAP

Why didn't you attach it? I'm pretty busy tomorrow, and want to get this
fixed ASAP. I mean, the plan is to release this weekend...

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to