On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:17:58PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Alex Pennace: > > > A program that is statically linked to NPTL will fail at runtime when > > calling raise(3) (and, by extension, abort(3)): > > Statically linked executables simply do not support NPTL. If > possible, a link-time warning should be generated, perhaps even an > error.
A warning or error would fix what is currently broken. Is it the case that NPTL's design critera explicitly excluded static linking, or is that facility a work in progress? What does POSIX have to say about supporting static linking? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
