On 2007-03-09 09:51 -0500, Jeremy Hankins wrote: > Assuming the answer is yes (or roughly yes), there are probably solutions > short of not permitting ion3 in stable. For example, how about a big flashy > banner (e.g., xmessage) on startup saying that the release of ion3 running is > old and completely unsupported by tuomov?
Yes, I have stated that I can live with that, but... > I'm sure that there are other, and probably better, approaches. ... there's no need to have ion3 in "static" (the proper name for the "stable" distribution). There's backports. You might be able to even add a dummy package that tells the user to install from backports, where it is updated whenever there's a new release. And as is known, a "stable" Ion3 should be released in some months time, and after that there shouldn't be much updates, and maybe in the next update to "static", it could be included there... (although the megafreeze model is still seriously broken). -- Tuomo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
