reopen 301696 thanks Hello
I closed the wrong bug. Sorry. On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 06:27:34PM +0100, Martin wrote: > > > >> >> > Please test the version in unstable as it might fix your problem. > > > >> >> Tested the version from unstable, think it was 0.30.204-1. > > > >> > That is the latest version. > > > >> The package page also lists 0.30.204-2 but it doesn't seem to be > > > >> available > > > >> yet. The changelog also doesn't suggest it will be any different. > > > >> > > > >> Should I report this upstream then? > > > > It would be really great. > > > Have done and I'll test the updated version in unstable when I get back to > > > the machine in question. > > Nice to know. > Alas still doesn't seem to work. Tried 0.30.204-3, I'll try -4 when it > hits the mirrors - tomorrow or Thursday I guess. > > > > >> BTW what's the difference between kernel-patch-vserver and > > > >> kernel-patch-ctx - they appear to be the same. Also what's the status > > > >> of > > > >> vserver / util-vserver on SPARC, I suspect I'll need to use it on a > > > >> large > > > >> SMP sun4u machine so if you need any help debugging it I'm happy to > > > >> help. > > > > kernel-patch-ctx and kernel-patch-vserver is the same thing. The > > > > only difference is that kernel-patch-vserver has support for 2.6 > > > > kernel too. It is simply a renamed package, as suggested by many > > > > people. > > > I guess kernel-patch-ctx will be dropped then. Ok, I'll make sure I only > > > install kernel-patch-vserver from now on. > > That would be a good thing. I will probably ask for its removal when > > kernel-patch-vserver has entered testing. > Cool. Have asked for its removal now as kernel-patch-vserver is now in testing. > > > > I think util-vserver will work on sparc (if it compiles). I have > > > > not tested though. > > > OK, I'll try it out and file bugs if there are any :-) > > Sounds really good. I may get a sparc machine myself so this would be > > great to have tested. :) > I've spoken with some of the folks on #vserver on irc.oftc.net and they > seem to think that the kernel patch should work, or at least is fixable > with a minimal amount of hacking, so I'm thinking of having a bit of a > purge and seeing how many architectures I can get it tested on. The d-i > team seem to need stuff testing as well so I'm tempted to try both at > the same time. Unfortuneatly I've just got rid of a lot of my weirder > architectures but sparc64 and ppc32 should be quite easy, sparc, mips, > hppa, alpha and maybe arm are possible as well. Hmmm... shall have to > see. Good luck. Regards, // Ola > Cheers, > - Martin > > > > -- > Martin > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Seasons change, things come to pass" > > -- --- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering ---- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://www.opal.dhs.org Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
