> > So it IPv6 still messy? if not, then probably this patch indeed could be
> > safely deapplied I guess ;-)
> This is probably referring to binding an IPv6 :: socket and getting IPv4
> for free
and if socket on IPv4 is taken already? this is what lead to the
original issue.
So should that "continue" should then be taken only if ai->ai_family ==
AF_INET6 ?
> so that a subsequent bind to an IPv4 0.0.0.0 address fails. So
> far as I know, this is still the Linux IPv6 behavior.
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
